There's a good article at worshipleader.com by Robb Redman, that is a review of and response to George Barna's Revolution. The article is called Revolution or Renewal? and it brings up some good points about the book.

"Revolution" means a clean break with the past and the introduction of something completely new... Historically, Christians have been more comfortable with renewal and revival to describe "radical and pervasive change," rather than revolution, because they point to the providential hand of God, rather than impersonal forces of history. Those of us who have been around long enough know that the Church in every generation has its "Revolutionaries" who are disillusioned with the local church and yearn for something more... [It's] not a revolution, but a rhythm of renewal and revival in response to the movement of the Holy Spirit among and within ordinary communities of faith.

So what happens to "revolutionaries" who separate from local churches to pursue ministry? They end up starting new ministries. In a sense, Redman is right, that this isn't about revolution as much as it is renewal. But I think it's a game of semantics, and I don't think that Barna would disagree with the heart of what Redman is saying.

Labels: books, church